The Entry-Level Career Paradox: How AI is Reshaping the First Rung of the Ladder

The calendar turned to 2026 with predictions from venture capitalists and industry analysts pointing to a sobering reality: this will be the year AI meaningfully impacts the labor market. For those of us who guide career transitions, the implications aren’t just theoretical—they’re already reshaping the fundamental pathway into professional work.

As someone who’s coached over 350 professionals through career pivots, I’ve seen countless challenges. But what’s emerging now is different. We’re witnessing the potential collapse of the traditional career ladder’s first rung, and it’s happening precisely as a new generation of graduates prepares to climb it.

The Numbers Tell a Stark Story

#

The evidence has been accumulating throughout 2025, and it paints an uncomfortable picture. According to TechCrunch’s December 31 report on AI and labor predictions, multiple enterprise venture capitalists identified 2026 as the year AI will significantly impact the workforce—and they weren’t even specifically asked about it (accessed January 1, 2026).

The research is particularly revealing. A November 2024 MIT study found that an estimated 11.7% of jobs could already be automated using AI. But the automation isn’t distributed evenly across experience levels. Entry-level positions—those critical first jobs that launch careers—are disproportionately vulnerable.

SignalFire, a data-driven VC firm that tracks job movements across 600 million LinkedIn profiles, discovered something alarming when analyzing 2024 hiring trends: Big Tech companies reduced hiring of new graduates by 25% compared to 2023, while startups decreased graduate recruitment by 11%. Meanwhile, these same companies increased hiring of professionals with two to five years of experience by 27% at Big Tech firms and 14% at startups, according to their May 2025 analysis (accessed January 1, 2026).

The pattern is clear: entry-level roles are shrinking while demand for experienced talent grows. This isn’t a typical economic cycle. It’s a structural shift driven by AI’s capabilities.

Why Entry-Level Work is Particularly Vulnerable

#

The vulnerability of entry-level positions isn’t coincidental—it’s architectural. These roles have traditionally served as training grounds precisely because they involve routine, lower-risk tasks where mistakes have limited consequences. New graduates learn professional norms, develop judgment, and build competence through repetition and gradual complexity.

That same characteristic—routine, structured work with clear parameters—makes these tasks ideal candidates for AI automation.

Asher Bantock, SignalFire’s head of research, stated there’s “convincing evidence” that AI adoption significantly contributes to declining entry-level hiring. The logic is straightforward: if AI can handle coding assistance, financial analysis, document review, and software installation—all traditional entry-level responsibilities—why hire junior staff to do them?

Consider investment banking, historically a grueling but lucrative entry point for ambitious graduates. Gabe Stengel, founder of AI financial analyst startup Rogo, noted that his tool “can do almost all the work I did” in his early career analyzing biotech companies for Lazard. According to a 2024 New York Times report, executives at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley have considered cutting junior analyst hiring by up to two-thirds and reducing pay for remaining positions because AI makes the work less demanding.

The World Economic Forum’s surveys reinforce this trend: 40% of employers intend to cut staff where AI can automate tasks (accessed January 1, 2026).

The Intensifying Paradox

#

Here’s where this becomes particularly cruel: we’re not eliminating the need for experience—we’re eliminating the pathway to gain it.

Heather Doshay, SignalFire’s people and talent partner, describes what she calls an “exacerbated” version of the classic career catch-22: “You can’t get hired without experience, but you can’t get experience without being hired.” While this paradox has always existed, AI dramatically intensifies it.

When companies could hire junior staff cheaply to handle routine work, they accepted the trade-off of training inexperienced workers. Now that AI handles those tasks more efficiently, the economic calculus changes. Companies increasingly want professionals who can deploy AI tools effectively from day one—which requires the very experience that entry-level jobs used to provide.

From my coaching perspective, this creates a genuine crisis for career launchers. The traditional advice—“start anywhere, learn the basics, prove yourself, then advance”—assumes that “start anywhere” positions exist. If they don’t, or if competition for the remaining entry-level roles becomes exponentially fiercer, we need fundamentally different strategies.

What 2026 Likely Holds

#

The venture capital predictions for 2026 suggest this trend will accelerate. Eric Bahn, co-founder and general partner at Hustle Fund, captured the uncertainty well: “Is it going to lead to more layoffs? Is there going to be higher productivity? Or will AI just be an augmentation for the existing labor market to be even more productive in the future? All of this seems pretty unanswered, but it seems like something big is going to happen in 2026.”

Marell Evans, founder of Exceptional Capital, predicted that “companies looking to increase AI spending will pull money from their pool for labor and hiring.” Jason Mendel of Battery Ventures suggested 2026 “will be the year of agents as software expands from making humans more productive to automating work itself.”

Perhaps most cynically, Antonia Dean of Black Operator Ventures predicted that “many enterprises, despite how ready or not they are to successfully use AI solutions, will say that they are increasing their investments in AI to explain why they are cutting back spending in other areas or trimming workforces.” AI, in other words, may become a convenient scapegoat for cost-cutting regardless of actual automation capabilities.

Strategic Responses for Career Launchers

#

So what do we tell recent graduates and career changers targeting entry-level positions in this environment? The standard platitudes feel inadequate, but some practical strategies emerge:

1. Master AI Tools Aggressively

Doshay’s advice is blunt but accurate: “AI won’t take your job if you’re the one who’s best at using it.” Don’t just use ChatGPT casually—become genuinely proficient with AI coding assistants, research tools, document analyzers, and automation platforms relevant to your target field. Your edge isn’t having more baseline knowledge than AI; it’s knowing how to deploy AI effectively.

2. Target Experience-Building Opportunities Outside Traditional Employment

If entry-level jobs are scarce, find alternative experience pathways: substantive internships, contract projects, freelance work, volunteer positions for legitimate organizations, or contributions to open-source projects. The goal is building a portfolio that demonstrates capability, not just collecting credentials.

3. Emphasize Skills Over Credentials

The credential inflation we’ve seen—where bachelor’s degrees became expected for jobs that previously required high school diplomas—may start reversing as employers recognize that demonstrated skills matter more than educational pedigree. If you can prove you accomplish results using AI tools, that evidence may outweigh a prestigious degree without practical skills.

4. Consider Less Automated Sectors

Not all industries are automating at the same pace. Fields requiring physical presence, complex human interaction, creative judgment in ambiguous situations, or highly regulated decision-making may maintain traditional entry pathways longer. Healthcare, education, social services, skilled trades, and creative industries may offer more stable entry points than technology or finance.

5. Reframe Career Starts as Skills Acquisition Rather Than Position Acquisition

If traditional linear career paths are breaking down, think of career launching as skills accumulation from multiple sources rather than securing a single “first job.” This is harder to navigate—it requires more initiative and tolerance for uncertainty—but it may better match the emerging reality.

The Broader Implications

#

This isn’t just about individual career strategies. We’re potentially dismantling a fundamental mechanism for social mobility. Entry-level professional work has historically provided a pathway for talented individuals from non-privileged backgrounds to enter high-earning careers. Remove those entry points, and we risk creating a more entrenched class structure where career access depends on existing networks and resources rather than demonstrated potential.

Educational institutions will need to adapt dramatically. If employers increasingly expect graduates to arrive with practical AI proficiency and portfolio evidence of capability, the traditional academic model—focused on knowledge transmission and theoretical understanding—may prove insufficient.

Companies also face a long-term talent development problem. If you don’t hire entry-level workers, where do your experienced professionals come from in five years? Some organizations may find they’ve created a talent pipeline crisis by over-relying on AI automation of junior work.

Looking Forward

#

There’s a tempting narrative that AI companies promote: their technology doesn’t eliminate jobs but rather helps workers focus on “deep work” and “higher-skilled tasks” while automating “repetitive busy work.” I’m skeptical of this framing, particularly for entry-level positions.

The reality appears more complex and less optimistic. Yes, some workers will transition to higher-value activities. But for those trying to enter the workforce, the elimination of “busy work” may mean elimination of entry opportunities entirely.

As career transition coaches and workforce development professionals, we need to be honest about this challenge rather than offering false reassurance. The career ladder many of us climbed may not exist in the same form for the next generation. We need new models, new pathways, and new thinking about how people build professional capabilities and launch careers.

The year 2026 may indeed be when AI meaningfully reshapes labor markets. For those of us guiding career development, our challenge is helping people navigate this transformation without pretending it’s business as usual. Because it clearly isn’t.

References

#

• TechCrunch (December 31, 2025). “Investors predict AI is coming for labor in 2026.” https://techcrunch.com/2025/12/31/investors-predict-ai-is-coming-for-labor-in-2026/ (Accessed January 1, 2026)
• TechCrunch (May 27, 2025). “AI may already be shrinking entry-level jobs in tech, new research suggests.” https://techcrunch.com/2025/05/27/ai-may-already-be-shrinking-entry-level-jobs-in-tech-new-research-suggests/ (Accessed January 1, 2026)
• The New York Times (April 10, 2024). “Investment Banking Jobs and Artificial Intelligence.” https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/10/business/investment-banking-jobs-artificial-intelligence.html (Referenced in TechCrunch article)
• SignalFire (2025). “State of Talent Report 2025.” https://www.signalfire.com/blog/signalfire-state-of-talent-report-2025 (Referenced in TechCrunch article)